The ownership of territorial disputes often involves complex factors such as history, law, international relations and national identity. Each specific territorial dispute has its own unique background and details, so it is difficult to use a unified standard to judge the ownership of territory. The following are some common considerations: 1. **Historical background**: The parties' interpretation of history and their claims to the past ownership of the territory are often at the core of the dispute. For example, which country or nation has controlled a certain area, how long they have controlled it, and whether there has been a legal transfer or conquest in history. 2. **International law**: International law, including relevant UN resolutions, can provide some basis for judgment. For example, the UN Charter emphasizes the principle of not using force to resolve disputes and respect for the right to self-determination. 3. **National identity**: The ethnic, cultural and linguistic identity of local residents often has an important impact on the issue of territorial ownership. Sometimes, the wishes of local people will have an impact on negotiations between countries. 4. **Status quo**: Actual control (that is, who actually manages and uses the area) also affects the resolution of territorial disputes in many cases. 5. **International arbitration**: Some territorial disputes are resolved through international courts or other arbitration institutions, although these rulings are not always accepted by the parties. If you are interested in a particular territorial dispute, please provide more information and I can provide you with more detailed background information and relevant perspectives.