In legal cases involving drone candid shots, defense strategies need to be formulated based on specific facts and legal provisions. If the goal of the defense is to claim that this behavior is to explore new media art forms rather than invade privacy, the following are some possible defense ideas： ### 1. **The legitimacy of artistic expression** -**Artistic freedom**: You can cite the provisions of the Constitution or related laws on freedom of artistic expression, emphasizing that artistic creation is an important part of social culture and should be protected. -**Artistic intent**: Provide evidence to prove that the defendant's behavior was indeed to explore new media art forms, not to maliciously invade the privacy of others. For example, to display his past works of art, creative plans or related statements. ### 2. **Reasonable expectations in public places** -**Definition of public places**: It is emphasized that in public places, individuals have a lower reasonable expectation of privacy. The content captured by drones may not involve highly private scenes, but the overall atmosphere or landscape of public spaces. -**Non-targeted shooting**: If the shooting behavior is random, non-targeted, and does not focus on a specific individual or private scene, it can be argued that the behavior has not substantially violated the privacy of others. ### 3. **Technological neutrality** -**Use of technical tools**: Emphasize that drones, as a technical tool, are not illegal in themselves. The key is how to use it. If the defendant's behavior is for artistic creation rather than malicious purposes, it should be regarded as fair use. -**Promotion of technological innovation**: It can be argued that drone shooting is an innovative means to promote the development of new media art, and society should be open to this emerging technology. ### 4. **Lack of malice or damage** -**No malicious motivation**: Provide evidence to prove that the defendant has no malice to invade the privacy of others, and his behavior is purely motivated by artistic creation. -**No actual damage**: If the filmed content has not been publicly disseminated or caused actual damage to others, it can be argued that its behavior has not caused substantial infringement of the privacy of others. ### 5. **Consideration of social value** -**The social value of art**: Emphasize the positive contribution of artistic creation to society, including cultural diversity, exchange of ideas, etc. Expert opinions or artistic reviews can be cited to prove that the defendant's works have artistic value and social significance. -**Public interest**: If the filmed content contributes to the public's attention or understanding of certain social issues, it can be argued that its behavior is in the public interest. ### 6. **Ambiguity of the application of law** -**Interpretation of legal provisions**: If the relevant laws are not clear enough on drone shooting, it can be argued that the legal provisions are vague and the defendant's behavior does not clearly violate the legal provisions. -**Reference to precedents**: If there are precedents for similar cases to be acquitted, these cases can be cited to support the defendant's defense. ### 7. **Possibility of settlement or mediation** - **Settlement agreement**: If there is a possibility of settlement in the case, it may be recommended that the defendant reach a settlement with the relevant parties to resolve the dispute through apology, compensation or other means to avoid further escalation of legal disputes. ### 8. **Support of public opinion** -**Public support**: If the defendant's behavior is supported by the art world or the public, the outcome of the case can be influenced by public opinion pressure. For example, initiating a joint petition, issuing a public statement, etc. ### Conclusion In the defense process, the key is to use evidence and argument to position the defendant's behavior as an artistic creation rather than an invasion of privacy. At the same time, it is necessary to formulate the most appropriate defense strategy based on the specific circumstances and legal provisions. If the defendant's behavior does pose a legal risk, it is recommended to seek professional legal advice as soon as possible to maximize the protection of his legal rights and interests.