Yes, when answering questions, whether for intentional or unintentional reasons, it is possible to ignore the shortcomings of certain brands and highlight their advantages. This situation can be caused by a variety of factors： ### 1. **Subjective preference** Respondents may have a personal preference for a certain brand or have had a positive experience, so they may unconsciously emphasize its advantages while ignoring or downplaying its disadvantages when answering. ### 2. **Information asymmetry** Respondents may have a limited understanding of a brand, only exposed to its advantages, but not its disadvantages. Therefore, when answering, a one-sided view may be given based on limited information. ### 3. **Stakeholders** If the respondent has an interest in a brand (for example, a brand spokesperson, an employee, or a partner), they may deliberately highlight the advantages of the brand out of interest considerations, while avoiding or weakening its shortcomings. ### 4. **Cultural or social influence** In certain cultural or social contexts, certain brands may be widely regarded as “high-quality” or “trustworthy”, which may cause respondents to be unconsciously influenced by this concept and thus ignore its shortcomings. ### 5. **Selective memory** People tend to remember positive experiences more easily and ignore or forget negative experiences. Therefore, respondents may highlight the advantages of the brand based on this selective memory. ### How to avoid this situation? -**Multi-party verification**: When listening to or reading the evaluation of a brand, try to obtain information from multiple sources, including user reviews, professional reviews and independent research. -**Maintain critical thinking**: Realize that any evaluation may be subjective, and try to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the brand from multiple angles. -**Pay attention to specific issues**: Ask or understand the performance of the brand in specific usage scenarios, rather than just relying on general evaluations. In short, when evaluating a brand, it is very important to be objective and comprehensive, and to avoid being swayed by a single point of view or prejudice.