In the decision-making process, although most people support a certain plan, the objections of a few people are still worthy of serious consideration. Here are a few reasons： 1. **Diversity and inclusiveness**: The opposition of a few people may represent different views or interests. These views may be ignored in some cases, but they may be critical to the comprehensiveness and fairness of decision-making. By considering the opinions of a few people, the decision-making process can be ensured to be more inclusive and diverse. 2. **Potential risks**: Objections may reveal potential problems or risks in the plan that have not been noticed by most people. By listening carefully to these objections, it can help the team identify and solve these problems in advance and avoid possible negative effects in the future. 3. **Team cohesion**: Ignoring the opinions of a few people may lead to division and discord within the team. Even if the final decision is still implemented in accordance with the opinions of the majority of people, giving a few people the opportunity to express their opinions and taking their views seriously will help maintain team cohesion and trust. 4. **Quality of decision-making**: Through discussion and debate, objections can prompt the team to think more deeply about all aspects of the plan, thereby improving the quality of decision-making. Even if these opinions are not adopted in the end, the discussion process itself can help the team better understand the advantages and disadvantages of the solution. 5. **Ethics and ethics**: In some cases, the opposition of a few people may involve moral or ethical issues. Ignoring these opinions may lead to ethical doubts in decision-making, and even lead to larger social or organizational problems. Therefore, although most people support a certain plan, it is still wise to seriously consider the objections of a few people. This not only helps to make more comprehensive and responsible decisions, but also helps to maintain team harmony and trust.