The Arab Spring is the general term for a series of anti-government protests, revolts and revolutions in North Africa and the Middle East in the early 21st century. This event had a profound impact on the politics, economy and society of the countries concerned. In the narrative of historical events, due to the positions and purposes of different stakeholders, there are indeed differences or distortions in the interpretation and description of certain historical details. This phenomenon is not unique to the Arab Spring, but a common phenomenon in historical research. In the context of the Arab Spring, the following aspects may be distorted or selectively emphasized for political purposes： 1. **The role of external forces**: Some narratives may exaggerate or downplay the role of external countries (such as the United States, the European Union, Russia, etc.) in the Arab Spring to serve a specific political agenda. For example, some people may emphasize the negative effects of external intervention, while others may ignore the role of external support in promoting protest activities. 2. **The influence of Islamic forces**: In some countries, such as Egypt and Tunisia, Islamic political parties have won elections after the Arab Spring. The evaluation of these political parties may be polarized. Supporters may emphasize their legitimacy and public opinion base, while opponents may describe them as extremist or anti-democratic forces. 3. **The narrative of violence and peaceful protest**: There were both peaceful protests and violent conflicts in the Arab Spring. Narratives from different positions may selectively emphasize a certain aspect in order to shape a specific historical image. For example, government supporters may emphasize violence to justify suppression, while opponents may highlight peaceful protests to demonstrate the legitimacy of the movement. 4. **Interpretation of economic and social factors**: The root causes of the Arab Spring include economic inequality, unemployment, corruption and other issues. The interpretation of these factors may vary from political position to political position. Some people may emphasize structural economic issues, while others may blame them on specific policies or leaders. 5. **Evaluation of the results of the revolution**: After the Arab Spring, some countries achieved political transformation, while others fell into long-term turmoil or resumed authoritarian rule. The evaluation of the results of the revolution may vary greatly depending on the political position. Supporters may emphasize the progress of democratization, while critics may point out chaos and disorder. When studying and understanding the Arab Spring, it is important to refer to as diverse sources of information as possible and critically analyze the motivations and backgrounds behind different narratives in order to gain a more comprehensive understanding of this complex historical event. Historical research should be committed to restoring facts and avoiding being swayed by a single political purpose.