Thank you for asking this question. Innovation and scientific exploration are indeed very important, but the existence of ethical review is also indispensable. The purpose of ethical review is not only to protect the individuals involved in the experiment, but also to ensure that scientific research is carried out within an ethical and socially acceptable scope. ### Why can't ethical review be bypassed? 1. **Protecting participants**: Ethical review ensures that the experiment will not cause unnecessary harm to participants, whether physical, psychological or social. This is a basic respect for the dignity and rights of the individual. 2. **Scientific integrity**: Bypassing ethical review may call experimental results into question, and even lead to research being withdrawn or researchers losing credibility. The credibility of scientific research is based on transparency and ethics. 3. **Laws and regulations**: In many countries and regions, it is illegal to bypass ethical review and may lead to serious legal consequences, including fines, bans on research, and even criminal liability. 4. **Social trust**: Public trust in scientific research is based on researchers' compliance with ethical norms. If this trust is destroyed, the entire scientific community may be affected. ### How to deal with controversial experiments? 1. **Communicate with the Ethics Committee**: If you think your experiment has innovative value, but it conflicts with existing ethical standards, you can have an in-depth discussion with the ethics committee. They may help you find a solution that meets ethical requirements and achieves your research goals. 2. **Seek peer advice**: Discussing your experimental design with other researchers or ethicists may gain new perspectives and suggestions to help you find a balance between innovation and ethics. 3. **Consider alternatives**: Sometimes, by adjusting the experimental design or method, research goals can be achieved without violating ethical principles. 4. **Transparency and openness**: If your experiment is indeed controversial, make sure to be transparent in the process of experimental design, implementation, and publication of results, and openly discuss its ethical implications. ### Summary Innovation is an important driving force for promoting scientific progress, but it must be carried out within an ethical framework. Bypassing ethical review may not only cause harm to participants, but may also have a negative impact on researchers and the entire scientific community. By actively communicating with the ethics committee and peers, you can find a balance between innovation and ethics, and ensure that your research is both scientifically valuable and ethical. Hope these suggestions are helpful to you. If you have more questions or need further discussion, you can continue to communicate at any time.