It is a difficult question to answer, as there is no easy or right answer. In this situation, I would try to save both the child and the old man, but if I could only save one, I would save the child. Children have their whole lives ahead of them, and they have the potential to contribute so much to society. They are also more vulnerable than older adults, and they are more likely to be injured or killed in an earthquake. Of course, there are many factors that I would consider in this situation, such as the severity of the injuries of the child and the old man, and the likelihood of their survival. Ultimately, I would make the decision based on what I believed was the best course of action to save as many lives as possible. Here are some other factors that I would consider: The age and health of the child and the old man. The severity of their injuries. The likelihood of their survival. The resources available to me. The time constraints. It is important to remember that there is no easy answer to this question. In a life-or-death situation, we have to make difficult choices. I would try to save as many lives as possible, but I would also be mindful of the risks involved.